What is a potential drawback when using the Design-Build method regarding project definition?

In the Design-Build method, one of the primary characteristics is that the design and construction phases are integrated, which can lead to significant benefits in terms of time and cost efficiency. However, a notable drawback is that programs must be defined early in the process. This is because, in a Design-Build arrangement, the contractor is typically selected before the final design is completed, requiring that the owner have a fairly clear outline of project requirements and expectations at the outset.

If a project is not adequately defined early on, it may lead to challenges later in the construction process. This can result in increased costs and potentially derail timelines, as significant decisions regarding project scope and design need to be made upfront to facilitate a smooth workflow. Unlike traditional approaches, where design can evolve as construction progresses, the Design-Build approach relies heavily on the initial specifications being well-defined to avoid complications later.

The other options do not accurately highlight the inherent limitations present in the Design-Build model, focusing instead on aspects that do not directly address the need for early project definition.